PDA

View Full Version : The REAL GI Joe



LA_MERC_FragFood
October 28th, 2007, 10:54 PM
OK, quickly here - this (http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/10849526.html) is the entire article about how the movie bigwigs are planning a live action GI Joe movie. BUT that GI Joe will no longer be a US Marine. Instead, he'll be part of a multinational for whose acronym will be GIJOE. Screw that. Here's the meat of the article (excerpted) - the story of the REAL GI Joe. One of the few articles that actually gives me goosebumps...

"...Well, who cares. G.I. Joe is just a toy, right? He was never real. Right?

On Nov. 15, 2003, an 85-year-old retired Marine Corps colonel died of congestive heart failure at his home in La Quinta, Calif., southeast of Palm Springs. He was a combat veteran of World War II. His name was Mitchell Paige.

It's hard today to envision -- or, for the dwindling few, to remember -- what the world looked like on Oct. 25, 1942 -- 65 years ago.

The U.S. Navy was not the most powerful fighting force in the Pacific. Not by a long shot. So the Navy basically dumped a few thousand lonely American Marines on the beach at Guadalcanal and high-tailed it out of there.

...snip...

But the Washington's one-sided battle with the Kirishima was still weeks in the future. On Oct. 25, Mitchell Paige was back on the God-forsaken malarial jungle island of Guadalcanal.

On Guadalcanal, the Marines struggled to complete an airfield that could threaten the Japanese route to Australia. Admiral Yamamoto knew how dangerous that was. Before long, relentless Japanese counterattacks had driven the supporting U.S. Navy from inshore waters. The Marines were on their own.

As Platoon Sgt. Mitchell Paige and his 33 riflemen set about carefully emplacing their four water-cooled .30-caliber Brownings on that hillside, 65 years ago this week -- manning their section of the thin khaki line that was expected to defend Henderson Field against the assault of the night of Oct. 25, 1942 -- it's unlikely anyone thought they were about to provide the definitive answer to that most desperate of questions: How many able-bodied U.S. Marines does it take to hold a hill against 2,000 armed and motivated attackers?

But by the time the night was over, "The 29th (Japanese) Infantry Regiment has lost 553 killed or missing and 479 wounded among its 2,554 men," historian Lippman reports. "The 16th (Japanese) Regiment's losses are uncounted, but the 164th's burial parties handled 975 Japanese bodies. ... The American estimate of 2,200 Japanese dead is probably too low."

You've already figured out where the Japanese focused their attack, haven't you? Among the 90 American dead and seriously wounded that night were all the men in Mitchell Paige's platoon. Every one. As the night of endless attacks wore on, Paige moved up and down his line, pulling his dead and wounded comrades back into their foxholes and firing a few bursts from each of the four Brownings in turn, convincing the Japanese forces down the hill that the positions were still manned.

The citation for Paige's Medal of Honor picks up the tale: "When the enemy broke through the line directly in front of his position, P/Sgt. Paige, commanding a machine gun section with fearless determination, continued to direct the fire of his gunners until all his men were either killed or wounded. Alone, against the deadly hail of Japanese shells, he fought with his gun and when it was destroyed, took over another, moving from gun to gun, never ceasing his withering fire."

In the end, Sgt. Paige picked up the last of the 40-pound, belt-fed Brownings and did something for which the weapon was never designed. Sgt. Paige walked down the hill toward the place where he could hear the last Japanese survivors rallying to move around his flank, the belt-fed gun cradled under his arm, firing as he went.

Coming up at dawn, battalion executive officer Major Odell M. Conoley was the first to discover how many able-bodied United States Marines it takes to hold a hill against two regiments of motivated, combat-hardened infantrymen who have never known defeat.

On a hill where the bodies were piled like cordwood, Mitchell Paige alone sat upright behind his 30-caliber Browning, waiting to see what the dawn would bring.

The hill had held, because on the hill remained the minimum number of able-bodied United States Marines necessary to hold the position.

And that's where the unstoppable wave of Japanese conquest finally crested, broke, and began to recede. On an unnamed jungle ridge on an insignificant island no one ever heard of, called Guadalcanal.

When the Hasbro Toy Co. called some years back, asking permission to put the retired colonel's face on some kid's doll, Mitchell Paige thought they must be joking.

But they weren't. That's his mug, on the little Marine they call "G.I. Joe." At least, it has been up till now.

Mitchell Paige's only condition? That G.I. Joe must always remain a United States Marine.

But don't worry. Far more important for our new movies not to offend anyone in Cairo or Karachi or Paris or Palembang.

After all, it's only a toy. It doesn't mean anything."

Damn. That's a great story.

LA_MERC_eX1|eS' ch1|d
October 29th, 2007, 04:57 PM
WOW.

I recognized parts of it from one of W.E.B. Griffin's books. He writes fiction books that are based on real life. I guess I didn't know just how real the real parts were. Amazing.

Daedelus
October 29th, 2007, 09:18 PM
wow growing up i always thought GI joe was an army guy. similar in the service we were tought gi joe was refrence for army. i do rember the toy Gung-ho and he was definatly a marine. am i wrong??

Rollout
October 31st, 2007, 08:07 PM
Man, I had SO MANY G.I. Joes as a kid, and various jeeps, scuba divers, and astronaught versions, I WAS G.I.Joe!!!!!!

LA_MERC_Captain_Obvious
November 5th, 2007, 11:08 PM
Press release from Hasbro since there are a bunch of people pissed off thinking hollywood will make blasphemy out of G.I. Joe :

Hasbro has released to following message to fans regarding Paramount Pictures' live-action G.I. Joe adaptation, to be directed by Stephen Sommers and written by Stuart Beattie:

Hasbro's G.I. Joe Team wanted to take this opportunity to clarify some of the facts regarding the G.I. Joe live-action movie that we are developing with Paramount Pictures.

First and foremost, we are not changing what the G.I. Joe brand is about. The name "G.I. Joe" will always be synonymous with bravery and heroism.

The G.I. Joe brand has enjoyed a successful 43-year history, spanning two key generations. The first was the line of 12-inch "realistic military" figures that were popular with kids in the 1960s and 1970s.

The second generation, was created in 1982, and is based on a cast of fictional heroes and villains that make up the "G.I. Joe vs. Cobra" fantasy. The premise of this fantasy is the story of the G.I. Joe team, led by Duke, and their "fight for freedom wherever there is trouble" against the evil Cobra Commander and his Cobra force. This storyline was an instant hit with kids in the early 1980s, spawning a highly popular 3-3/4-inch action figure line, comic book collection and animated series.

This movie will be a modern telling of the "G.I. Joe vs. Cobra" storyline and its compelling characters that Hasbro created 25 years ago. The G.I. Joe team will not be based in Brussels. Instead, they will be based out of the "Pit" as they were throughout the 1980s comic book series. And, in keeping with the G.I. Joe vs. Cobra fantasy, the movie will feature characters and locations from around the world. Duke, the lead character and head of the G.I. Joe team, will embody the values of bravery and heroism that the first generation of G.I. Joe figures established.

G.I. Joe is a very important property to Hasbro and we thank all of our fans for their enthusiasm. Without all of you, the brand would not be where it is today.

G.I. Joe is expected to hit theaters in 2009.

LA_MERC_Shadow
November 6th, 2007, 06:12 AM
They still didn't say that it would be a Marine. They beat around the bush on that one. All they're saying is that it's not based in Brussels.

LA_MERC_YellowDog
November 6th, 2007, 08:38 AM
Yep.. its a PR move to try and put out some fires without admitting they screwed up. I'm sure if they make G.I Joe anything but an American soldier.. the movie will tank... I sure wont go see it.

LA_MERC_FragFood
November 12th, 2007, 07:26 PM
The consumers of the world will rise up and shout with one voice to these studios "Don't mess with my MEMORIES, man!

Tired of this bull$hit. Kick ass, take names, move on. That's G.I. Joe. None of this multicultural, touchy-feelie candy ass stuff. Shoot 'em all, let the higher power of your choice sort 'em out. At least that's how we played G.I. Joe. Had a brick we called the "Equalizer" that'd take out most any fortress the other side had... ;-)

42d3e78f26a4b20d412==