PDA

View Full Version : Your Tax Paying Dollars at Work



LA_MERC_LaTech
January 31st, 2007, 10:20 AM
When do we get a say in how our money is spent?

WASHINGTON - The U.S. government wasted tens of millions of dollars in Iraq reconstruction aid, including scores of unaccounted-for weapons and a never-used camp for housing police trainers with an Olympic-size swimming pool, investigators say.

The quarterly audit by Stuart Bowen Jr., the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, is the latest to paint a grim picture of waste, fraud and frustration in an Iraq war and reconstruction effort that has cost taxpayers more than $300 billion and left the region near civil war.

"The security situation in Iraq continues to deteriorate, hindering progress in all reconstruction sectors and threatening the overall reconstruction effort," according to the 579-page report, which was being released Wednesday.

Calling Iraq's sectarian violence the greatest challenge, Bowen said in a telephone interview that billions in U.S. aid spent on strengthening security has had limited effect. Reconstruction now will fall largely on Iraqis to manage — and they're nowhere ready for the task.

The audit comes as
President Bush is pressing Congress to approve $1.2 billion in new reconstruction aid as part of his broader plan to stabilize Iraq by sending 21,500 more U.S. troops to Baghdad and Anbar province.

Democrats in Congress have been skeptical. Virginia Sen. Jim Webb has suggested that the U.S. is spending too much on Iraq reconstruction at the expense of Hurricane Katrina rebuilding in New Orleans, while California Rep. Henry Waxman (news, bio, voting record) plans in-depth hearings next week into charges of Iraq waste and fraud.

According to the report, the State Department paid $43.8 million to contractor DynCorp International for the residential camp for police training personnel outside of Baghdad's Adnan Palace grounds that has stood empty for months. About $4.2 million of the money was improperly spent on 20 VIP trailers and an Olympic-size pool, all ordered by the Iraqi Ministry of Interior but never authorized by the U.S.

U.S. officials spent another $36.4 million for weapons such as armored vehicles, body armor and communications equipment that can't be accounted for. DynCorp also may have prematurely billed $18 million in other potentially unjustified costs, the report said.

Responding, the State Department said in the report that it was working to improve controls. Already, it has developed a review process that rejected a $1.1 million DynCorp bill earlier this month on a separate contract because the billed rate was incorrect.

A spokesman for DynCorp, Greg Lagana, did not immediately return a phone message seeking comment.

Bowen, whose office was nearly eliminated last month by administration-friendly Republicans in Congress, called spending waste in Iraq a continuing problem. Corruption is high among Iraqi officials, while U.S. contract management remains somewhat weak.

With America's $21 billion rebuilding effort largely finished, it will be up to the international community and the Iraqis to step up its dollars to sustain reconstruction, Bowen said in the interview. "That will be a long-term and very expensive process," he said.

According to the report:

_Major U.S. contractors in Iraq, including Bechtel National and Kellogg, Brown and Root Services Inc., said they devoted an average 12.5 percent of their total expenses for security.

_Bowen's office opened 27 new criminal probes in the last quarter, bringing the total number of active cases to 78. Twenty-three are awaiting prosecutorial action by the Justice Department, most of them centering on charges of bribery and kickbacks.

Still, "fraud has not been a significant component of the U.S. experience in Iraq," Bowen said.

As of the end of 2006, contracts had been let for all of the $21 billion Congress put into the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund it created in 2003. Some 80 percent of the money has been paid out, the report said.

Since 2003, use of the reconstruction aid changed several times as U.S. officials shifted priorities to spend more on security problems or programs critical to supporting elections or developing the new government.

For example, money was cut from what had been originally planned for electricity, water, oil projects and transportation and communication so it could be used to help pay for such things as health care, elections, democracy programs and training Iraqi security forces.

Overall, the largest single expense was security. The total was spent in the following way:

_34 percent for security and justice.

_23 percent to try to generate and distribute electricity. Still, the report noted, output in the last quarter averaged below pre-war levels.

_12 percent for water.

_12 percent for economic and societal development.

_9 percent for oil and gas.

_4 percent for transportation and communications.

_4 percent for health care.

Auditors had "significant concern" about the way ahead, partly because of the Iraqi government's bad track record on budgeting for such projects, the report said. It said the Iraqi government had "billions of budgeted dollars remained unspent at the end of 2006."

Unemployment remains high, contributing to the insurgency because it sours the population and leaves idle young men to their own devices, according to the report.

The government's "most significant challenge continues to be strengthening rule-of-law institutions — the judiciary, prisons and the police," the report said. "The United States has spent billions of dollars in this area, with limited success to date."

LA_MERC_YellowDog
January 31st, 2007, 03:58 PM
Well, to read that report it sounds like were suppose to build a whole new country from the ground up. All I can say is **** it... right now I dont care anymore.

Big_ch33se
January 31st, 2007, 05:31 PM
I say we nuke the entire region into a nice glass sculpture and charge people to ride up and view it from space. FIX New Orleans silly turds!!!

LA_MERC_Wetzny
February 7th, 2007, 09:33 AM
More of the same BS...

House Conservatives vs. Speaker Pelosi on Air Force One [Kathryn Jean Lopez]


From the Republican Study Committee:

As you may have heard, Speaker Nancy Pelosi pressed the Department of Defense to provide her a military aircraft for flights - including trips back to San Francisco. But Did You Know?
ü Who Pays for Speaker Pelosi's travel? You do.

· Speaker Pelosi is driven by a government owned SUV that is exempt from the gas tax when used for business related travel. Thus, Speaker Pelosi not only avoids paying for auto travel (paid for by Capitol Police) she doesn't even pay the gas tax that millions of Americans pay each day. (Internal Revenue Code Section 6421E).

§ Rep. Pelosi has voted to raise gasoline taxes at least five times.

· Speaker Pelosi has requested an Air Force C-32 - a plane from a fleet that that typically carries the vice president, the first lady, and Cabinet officials. Operating Costs are approximately $15,000 an hour. Speaker Pelosi is not responsible for paying for the use of her "personal" Department of Defense jet - which will be used to transport not just herself, but staff, family, other members and friends. That bill is paid for by taxpayer dollars allotted to the Department of Defense.

§ "...For one of those planes to fly the speaker home to San Francisco, drop her off, and fly back and get her, would cost taxpayers around $300,000 - while round-trip commercial fares start at $233." (DC Examiner, 2/5/2007)

§ The larger plane requested by Speaker Pelosi would include 42 business class seats, a fully-enclosed state room, an entertainment center, a private bed, state-of-the-art communications system and a crew of 16. (CNN, 2/5/07)

· In contrast, Speaker Hastert "...used a smaller jet that seats 12 and has five crew members and none of the amenities." (CNN, 2/5/07)

§ "U.S. Air Force travel for VIPs such as members of Congress is first-rate. The planes are staffed with stewards who serve meals and tend an open bar." (Washington Times, 2/1/2007)

ü To borrow her own words, it's time for Speaker Pelosi to "Walk the Walk" on her beliefs and priorities: Speaker Pelosi maintains that that, "The science of global warming and its impact is overwhelming and unequivocal." (Boston Globe, 1/22/07). "It's an issue that the speaker thinks is critical to address," said Pelosi spokeswoman Jennifer Crider. (AP, 1/18/2007)

· In his State of the Union this year, President Bush proposed tackling the issue by aiming to cut gasoline consumption by 20% in 10 years... And Democrats remained skeptical about his commitment. "It's not just about what he says. It's about what he does." [Speaker] Pelosi said. "In the past ... he has talked the talk on climate change. But he hasn't walked the walk." (Los Angeles Times, 1/24/2007)

ü There seems to be a lot of confusion about the motives behind Mrs. Pelosi's landmark request - including some within her own office. But, Defense Officials seem to have an answer.

· ".... [Pelosi's] safety would be best ensured by using a plane that has the fuel capacity to go coast-to-coast.... "There's a certain amount of inefficiency and risk involved in stopping and having to refuel," said Dew Hammill, Spokesman for the Speaker. (Roll Call, 2/5/2007)

"...sources, who include those in Congress and in the administration, said the Democrat is seeking regular military flights not only for herself and her staff, but also for relatives and for other members of the California delegation." (Washington Times, 2/1/2007

"...According to reports, Speaker Pelosi requested the use of a military plane to attend a retreat in Williamsburg, Virginia, last week. That's 150 miles or a two-hour drive from Washington, D.C. That request, by all accounts, was denied." (CNN, 2/5/07)

"The Department of Defense offered Speaker Pelosi the same aircraft' as the one used by Hastert...." "She found it was not big enough for staff, supporters and other Members." (Roll Call, 2/5/2007)

· The defense source, who asked not to be named, termed her request "carte blanche," saying "she wanted a plane that could carry an entourage just like President Bush, who flies on Air Force One, and Vice President **** Cheney, who also always flies on military planes." (Washington Times, 2/7/2007)

What a Wh0re...

LA_MERC_th33_r00k
February 7th, 2007, 01:48 PM
I refrain....

LA_MERC_YellowDog
February 7th, 2007, 04:17 PM
waste not want not... Errrr somthing like that... I think their all a bunch of over paid pampered wimps... Gimme Gimme Gimme.. Blah blah blah!!

LA_MERC_LaTech
February 7th, 2007, 04:18 PM
All politicians are that way...I think it's a requirement.

LA_MERC_Yankee
March 15th, 2007, 09:55 AM
I've got 2500 posts to catch up on and that is way too much to read. LOL

LA_MERC_Andyconda
March 15th, 2007, 10:29 AM
I've got 2500 posts to catch up on and that is way too much to read. LOL

I've got 2 posts to catch up on and thats still WAY too much to read.

LA_MERC_Andyconda
March 15th, 2007, 10:30 AM
P.S. Great to see you on the site Reed. I've missed you stud.

LA_MERC_th33_r00k
March 15th, 2007, 11:20 AM
First one was by this guy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Bowen about the war effort. Seems like it would be unbiased.

The second one was authored by the Republican Study Committee about new Democratic leaders. I am not sure if this would be biased or not. I don't personally know the "Republican Study Committee".

42d3e78f26a4b20d412==